Subject	my 92 is much faster than my 93 (n/m)
Posted by	zgene4 on July 12, 2005 at 3:37 PM
	This message has been viewed 19 times.
In Reply To	My 1993 TT is much faster than my 1992 TT. (n/m) posted by 300ZXquire on July 12, 2005 at 02:56 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Why is the 1993 300zx Twin Turbo... - Opal 12:01:43 07/12/05 I'm sorry I just had to laugh at that for a second - ZXRider(SoCal) 12:04:26 07/12/05 Re: I'm sorry I just had to laugh at that for a second - Opal 12:09:13 07/12/05 It's all in the variables from one car to the next. Don't - Dave N 12:11:36 07/12/05 I doubt its because of the motor. Maybe its the weight? - zQuikonE 12:12:31 07/12/05 are you buying an auto or 5-speed that would make - sethkins88 12:13:50 07/12/05 Where did you "ask around?" - Zfreak(Dallas) 12:22:32 07/12/05 Re: Where did you "ask around?" - Opal 13:08:12 07/12/05 They were all wrong. (n/m) - Kenny 13:14:18 07/12/05 Re: They were all wrong. - Opal 13:18:42 07/12/05 Exactly the same as a decent time for a 90-96. - Kenny 13:21:28 07/12/05 Re: Exactly the same as a decent time for a 90-96. - SactoTodd 13:22:38 07/12/05 Now I have to clean the spit off my monitor. (n/m) - Kenny 13:29:31 07/12/05 true dat (n/m) - zgene4 15:29:18 07/12/05 why? - SactoTodd 13:21:58 07/12/05 Yes, Salah is always faster... (n/m) - Scotts94z32 13:43:12 07/12/05 thats what she said (n/m) - Spee 17:49:47 07/12/05 Folks....mind the green N please. He's got less than 50 hits - Dave N 12:23:23 07/12/05 lol... that last part is almost sig worthy... - PennState Z 12:49:50 07/12/05 Bah! - YugoBernie (NoVA) 13:07:02 07/12/05 lmao (n/m) - Southern-Z (Little Rock) 13:26:36 07/12/05 B/M'd. Thanks. :-) (n/m) - Dave N 14:26:26 07/12/05 lol. (n/m) - WickedZX (NoVA) 14:29:10 07/12/05 Hey BB; thought you could shoot better than that. - Jimzman 16:21:58 07/12/05 Exacly Dave...I mean look how I turned out! :-) (n/m) - BondzTT 13:28:44 07/12/05 the green N is not a license to be a dumbass. (n/m) - Spee 17:47:58 07/12/05 there are so many variables that affect the performance of - JC_NS 12:29:55 07/12/05 Re: Why is the 1993 300zx Twin Turbo... - Fuzznutz 12:50:59 07/12/05 This thread has been 96 OBDII accuracy approved. - Zluster(Project Platypus) 13:29:28 07/12/05 Re: This thread has been 96 OBDII accuracy approved. - Fuzznutz 14:20:17 07/12/05 94's also right? (n/m) - Rob'Z 13:29:41 07/12/05 Nope. (n/m) - whitepearlz 13:39:48 07/12/05 but remember they have ugly spoilers - aliaZ 14:26:22 07/12/05 yup - PennState Z 14:53:07 07/12/05 Wrong. (n/m) - Fuzznutz 18:28:53 07/12/05 It's not. Thank you. Please drive through. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 12:54:03 07/12/05 wait huh???......I mean what??????? (n/m) - Southern-Z (Little Rock) 13:22:58 07/12/05 93's came with Nawz - SimplyZ(MD) 13:25:09 07/12/05 only if you states "I live my life one 1/4 mile at a time." (n/m) - SnowManZ 14:23:22 07/12/05 didnt the 96 drop 20 horses??? (n/m) - Southern-Z (Little Rock) 13:28:45 07/12/05 unofficially yes - the 5spd models - Rob'Z 13:32:15 07/12/05 you are correct. They dropped variable valve timing to meet - rufflez 14:40:16 07/12/05 '96 they droped the VVT. That was it (n/m) - WAGGZ 21:20:18 07/12/05 you are going to buy a USED car and those - RedSER13 13:43:22 07/12/05 My 1993 TT is much faster than my 1992 TT. (n/m) - 300ZXquire 14:56:30 07/12/05 my 92 is much faster than my 93 (n/m) - zgene4 15:37:26 07/12/05 approx ~ mid 5's to 60/ 14 to quarter (n/m) - stockplayerz (NYC) 15:57:13 07/12/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.